Math::Complex man page on IRIX

Man page or keyword search:  
man Server   31559 pages
apropos Keyword Search (all sections)
Output format
IRIX logo
[printable version]

Math::Complex(3) Perl Programmers Reference GuideMath::Complex(3)

NAME
       Math::Complex - complex numbers and associated mathemati
       cal functions

SYNOPSIS
	       use Math::Complex;

	       $z = Math::Complex->make(5, 6);
	       $t = 4 - 3*i + $z;
	       $j = cplxe(1, 2*pi/3);

DESCRIPTION
       This package lets you create and manipulate complex num
       bers. By default, Perl limits itself to real numbers, but
       an extra "use" statement brings full complex support,
       along with a full set of mathematical functions typically
       associated with and/or extended to complex numbers.

       If you wonder what complex numbers are, they were invented
       to be able to solve the following equation:

	       x*x = -1

       and by definition, the solution is noted i (engineers use
       j instead since i usually denotes an intensity, but the
       name does not matter). The number i is a pure imaginary
       number.

       The arithmetics with pure imaginary numbers works just
       like you would expect it with real numbers... you just
       have to remember that

	       i*i = -1

       so you have:

	       5i + 7i = i * (5 + 7) = 12i
	       4i - 3i = i * (4 - 3) = i
	       4i * 2i = -8
	       6i / 2i = 3
	       1 / i = -i

       Complex numbers are numbers that have both a real part and
       an imaginary part, and are usually noted:

	       a + bi

       where "a" is the real part and "b" is the imaginary part.
       The arithmetic with complex numbers is straightforward.
       You have to keep track of the real and the imaginary
       parts, but otherwise the rules used for real numbers just
       apply:

	       (4 + 3i) + (5 - 2i) = (4 + 5) + i(3 - 2) = 9 + i
	       (2 + i) * (4 - i) = 2*4 + 4i -2i -i*i = 8 + 2i + 1 = 9 + 2i

       A graphical representation of complex numbers is possible
       in a plane (also called the complex plane, but it's really
       a 2D plane).  The number

	       z = a + bi

       is the point whose coordinates are (a, b). Actually, it
       would be the vector originating from (0, 0) to (a, b). It
       follows that the addition of two complex numbers is a vec
       torial addition.

       Since there is a bijection between a point in the 2D plane
       and a complex number (i.e. the mapping is unique and
       reciprocal), a complex number can also be uniquely identi
       fied with polar coordinates:

	       [rho, theta]

       where "rho" is the distance to the origin, and "theta" the
       angle between the vector and the x axis. There is a nota
       tion for this using the exponential form, which is:

	       rho * exp(i * theta)

       where i is the famous imaginary number introduced above.
       Conversion between this form and the cartesian form "a +
       bi" is immediate:

	       a = rho * cos(theta)
	       b = rho * sin(theta)

       which is also expressed by this formula:

	       z = rho * exp(i * theta) = rho * (cos theta + i * sin theta)

       In other words, it's the projection of the vector onto the
       x and y axes. Mathematicians call rho the norm or modulus
       and theta the argument of the complex number. The norm of
       "z" will be noted "abs(z)".

       The polar notation (also known as the trigonometric repre
       sentation) is much more handy for performing multiplica
       tions and divisions of complex numbers, whilst the carte
       sian notation is better suited for additions and subtrac
       tions. Real numbers are on the x axis, and therefore theta
       is zero or pi.

       All the common operations that can be performed on a real
       number have been defined to work on complex numbers as
       well, and are merely extensions of the operations defined
       on real numbers. This means they keep their natural mean
       ing when there is no imaginary part, provided the number
       is within their definition set.

       For instance, the "sqrt" routine which computes the square
       root of its argument is only defined for non-negative real
       numbers and yields a non-negative real number (it is an
       application from R+ to R+).  If we allow it to return a
       complex number, then it can be extended to negative real
       numbers to become an application from R to C (the set of
       complex numbers):

	       sqrt(x) = x >= 0 ? sqrt(x) : sqrt(-x)*i

       It can also be extended to be an application from C to C,
       whilst its restriction to R behaves as defined above by
       using the following definition:

	       sqrt(z = [r,t]) = sqrt(r) * exp(i * t/2)

       Indeed, a negative real number can be noted "[x,pi]" (the
       modulus x is always non-negative, so "[x,pi]" is really
       "-x", a negative number) and the above definition states
       that

	       sqrt([x,pi]) = sqrt(x) * exp(i*pi/2) = [sqrt(x),pi/2] = sqrt(x)*i

       which is exactly what we had defined for negative real
       numbers above.  The "sqrt" returns only one of the solu
       tions: if you want the both, use the "root" function.

       All the common mathematical functions defined on real num
       bers that are extended to complex numbers share that same
       property of working as usual when the imaginary part is
       zero (otherwise, it would not be called an extension,
       would it?).

       A new operation possible on a complex number that is the
       identity for real numbers is called the conjugate, and is
       noted with an horizontal bar above the number, or "~z"
       here.

		z = a + bi
	       ~z = a - bi

       Simple... Now look:

	       z * ~z = (a + bi) * (a - bi) = a*a + b*b

       We saw that the norm of "z" was noted "abs(z)" and was
       defined as the distance to the origin, also known as:

	       rho = abs(z) = sqrt(a*a + b*b)

       so

	       z * ~z = abs(z) ** 2

       If z is a pure real number (i.e. "b == 0"), then the above
       yields:

	       a * a = abs(a) ** 2

       which is true ("abs" has the regular meaning for real num
       ber, i.e. stands for the absolute value). This example
       explains why the norm of "z" is noted "abs(z)": it extends
       the "abs" function to complex numbers, yet is the regular
       "abs" we know when the complex number actually has no
       imaginary part... This justifies a posteriori our use of
       the "abs" notation for the norm.

OPERATIONS
       Given the following notations:

	       z1 = a + bi = r1 * exp(i * t1)
	       z2 = c + di = r2 * exp(i * t2)
	       z = <any complex or real number>

       the following (overloaded) operations are supported on
       complex numbers:

	       z1 + z2 = (a + c) + i(b + d)
	       z1 - z2 = (a - c) + i(b - d)
	       z1 * z2 = (r1 * r2) * exp(i * (t1 + t2))
	       z1 / z2 = (r1 / r2) * exp(i * (t1 - t2))
	       z1 ** z2 = exp(z2 * log z1)
	       ~z = a - bi
	       abs(z) = r1 = sqrt(a*a + b*b)
	       sqrt(z) = sqrt(r1) * exp(i * t/2)
	       exp(z) = exp(a) * exp(i * b)
	       log(z) = log(r1) + i*t
	       sin(z) = 1/2i (exp(i * z1) - exp(-i * z))
	       cos(z) = 1/2 (exp(i * z1) + exp(-i * z))
	       atan2(z1, z2) = atan(z1/z2)

       The following extra operations are supported on both real
       and complex numbers:

	       Re(z) = a
	       Im(z) = b
	       arg(z) = t
	       abs(z) = r

	       cbrt(z) = z ** (1/3)
	       log10(z) = log(z) / log(10)
	       logn(z, n) = log(z) / log(n)

	       tan(z) = sin(z) / cos(z)

	       csc(z) = 1 / sin(z)
	       sec(z) = 1 / cos(z)
	       cot(z) = 1 / tan(z)

	       asin(z) = -i * log(i*z + sqrt(1-z*z))
	       acos(z) = -i * log(z + i*sqrt(1-z*z))
	       atan(z) = i/2 * log((i+z) / (i-z))

	       acsc(z) = asin(1 / z)
	       asec(z) = acos(1 / z)
	       acot(z) = atan(1 / z) = -i/2 * log((i+z) / (z-i))

	       sinh(z) = 1/2 (exp(z) - exp(-z))
	       cosh(z) = 1/2 (exp(z) + exp(-z))
	       tanh(z) = sinh(z) / cosh(z) = (exp(z) - exp(-z)) / (exp(z) + exp(-z))

	       csch(z) = 1 / sinh(z)
	       sech(z) = 1 / cosh(z)
	       coth(z) = 1 / tanh(z)

	       asinh(z) = log(z + sqrt(z*z+1))
	       acosh(z) = log(z + sqrt(z*z-1))
	       atanh(z) = 1/2 * log((1+z) / (1-z))

	       acsch(z) = asinh(1 / z)
	       asech(z) = acosh(1 / z)
	       acoth(z) = atanh(1 / z) = 1/2 * log((1+z) / (z-1))

       arg, abs, log, csc, cot, acsc, acot, csch, coth, acosech,
       acotanh, have aliases rho, theta, ln, cosec, cotan,
       acosec, acotan, cosech, cotanh, acosech, acotanh, respec
       tively.	"Re", "Im", "arg", "abs", "rho", and "theta" can
       be used also also mutators.  The "cbrt" returns only one
       of the solutions: if you want all three, use the "root"
       function.

       The root function is available to compute all the n roots
       of some complex, where n is a strictly positive integer.
       There are exactly n such roots, returned as a list. Get
       ting the number mathematicians call "j" such that:

	       1 + j + j*j = 0;

       is a simple matter of writing:

	       $j = ((root(1, 3))[1];

       The kth root for "z = [r,t]" is given by:

	       (root(z, n))[k] = r**(1/n) * exp(i * (t + 2*k*pi)/n)

       The spaceship comparison operator, <=>, is also defined.
       In order to ensure its restriction to real numbers is con
       form to what you would expect, the comparison is run on
       the real part of the complex number first, and imaginary
       parts are compared only when the real parts match.

CREATION
       To create a complex number, use either:

	       $z = Math::Complex->make(3, 4);
	       $z = cplx(3, 4);

       if you know the cartesian form of the number, or

	       $z = 3 + 4*i;

       if you like. To create a number using the polar form, use
       either:

	       $z = Math::Complex->emake(5, pi/3);
	       $x = cplxe(5, pi/3);

       instead. The first argument is the modulus, the second is
       the angle (in radians, the full circle is 2*pi).
       (Mnemonic: "e" is used as a notation for complex numbers
       in the polar form).

       It is possible to write:

	       $x = cplxe(-3, pi/4);

       but that will be silently converted into "[3,-3pi/4]",
       since the modulus must be non-negative (it represents the
       distance to the origin in the complex plane).

       It is also possible to have a complex number as either
       argument of either the "make" or "emake": the appropriate
       component of the argument will be used.

	       $z1 = cplx(-2,  1);
	       $z2 = cplx($z1, 4);

STRINGIFICATION
       When printed, a complex number is usually shown under its
       cartesian style a+bi, but there are legitimate cases where
       the polar style [r,t] is more appropriate.

       By calling the class method "Math::Complex::display_for
       mat" and supplying either ""polar"" or ""cartesian"" as an
       argument, you override the default display style, which is
       ""cartesian"". Not supplying any argument returns the cur
       rent settings.

       This default can be overridden on a per-number basis by
       calling the "display_format" method instead. As before,
       not supplying any argument returns the current display
       style for this number. Otherwise whatever you specify will
       be the new display style for this particular number.

       For instance:

	       use Math::Complex;

	       Math::Complex::display_format('polar');
	       $j = (root(1, 3))[1];
	       print "j = $j\n";	       # Prints "j = [1,2pi/3]"
	       $j->display_format('cartesian');
	       print "j = $j\n";	       # Prints "j = -0.5+0.866025403784439i"

       The polar style attempts to emphasize arguments like
       k*pi/n (where n is a positive integer and k an integer
       within [-9, +9]), this is called polar pretty-printing.

       CHANGED IN PERL 5.6

       The "display_format" class method and the corresponding
       "display_format" object method can now be called using a
       parameter hash instead of just a one parameter.

       The old display format style, which can have values
       ""cartesian"" or ""polar"", can be changed using the
       ""style"" parameter.

	       $j->display_format(style => "polar");

       The one parameter calling convention also still works.

	       $j->display_format("polar");

       There are two new display parameters.

       The first one is ""format"", which is a sprintf()-style
       format string to be used for both numeric parts of the
       complex number(s).  The is somewhat system-dependent but
       most often it corresponds to ""%.15g"".	You can revert to
       the default by setting the "format" to "undef".

	       # the $j from the above example

	       $j->display_format('format' => '%.5f');
	       print "j = $j\n";	       # Prints "j = -0.50000+0.86603i"
	       $j->display_format('format' => undef);
	       print "j = $j\n";	       # Prints "j = -0.5+0.86603i"

       Notice that this affects also the return values of the
       "display_format" methods: in list context the whole param
       eter hash will be returned, as opposed to only the style
       parameter value.	 This is a potential incompatibility with
       earlier versions if you have been calling the "dis
       play_format" method in list context.

       The second new display parameter is
       ""polar_pretty_print"", which can be set to true or false,
       the default being true.	See the previous section for what
       this means.

USAGE
       Thanks to overloading, the handling of arithmetics with
       complex numbers is simple and almost transparent.

       Here are some examples:

	       use Math::Complex;

	       $j = cplxe(1, 2*pi/3);  # $j ** 3 == 1
	       print "j = $j, j**3 = ", $j ** 3, "\n";
	       print "1 + j + j**2 = ", 1 + $j + $j**2, "\n";

	       $z = -16 + 0*i;		       # Force it to be a complex
	       print "sqrt($z) = ", sqrt($z), "\n";

	       $k = exp(i * 2*pi/3);
	       print "$j - $k = ", $j - $k, "\n";

	       $z->Re(3);		       # Re, Im, arg, abs,
	       $j->arg(2);		       # (the last two aka rho, theta)
					       # can be used also as mutators.

ERRORS DUE TO DIVISION BY ZERO OR LOGARITHM OF ZERO
       The division (/) and the following functions

	       log     ln      log10   logn
	       tan     sec     csc     cot
	       atan    asec    acsc    acot
	       tanh    sech    csch    coth
	       atanh   asech   acsch   acoth

       cannot be computed for all arguments because that would
       mean dividing by zero or taking logarithm of zero. These
       situations cause fatal runtime errors looking like this

	       cot(0): Division by zero.
	       (Because in the definition of cot(0), the divisor sin(0) is 0)
	       Died at ...

       or

	       atanh(-1): Logarithm of zero.
	       Died at...

       For the "csc", "cot", "asec", "acsc", "acot", "csch",
       "coth", "asech", "acsch", the argument cannot be "0"
       (zero).	For the the logarithmic functions and the
       "atanh", "acoth", the argument cannot be "1" (one).  For
       the "atanh", "acoth", the argument cannot be "-1" (minus
       one).  For the "atan", "acot", the argument cannot be "i"
       (the imaginary unit).  For the "atan", "acoth", the argu
       ment cannot be "-i" (the negative imaginary unit).  For
       the "tan", "sec", "tanh", the argument cannot be pi/2 + k
       * pi, where k is any integer.

       Note that because we are operating on approximations of
       real numbers, these errors can happen when merely `too
       close' to the singularities listed above.

ERRORS DUE TO INDIGESTIBLE ARGUMENTS
       The "make" and "emake" accept both real and complex argu
       ments.  When they cannot recognize the arguments they will
       die with error messages like the following

	   Math::Complex::make: Cannot take real part of ...
	   Math::Complex::make: Cannot take real part of ...
	   Math::Complex::emake: Cannot take rho of ...
	   Math::Complex::emake: Cannot take theta of ...

BUGS
       Saying "use Math::Complex;" exports many mathematical rou
       tines in the caller environment and even overrides some
       ("sqrt", "log").	 This is construed as a feature by the
       Authors, actually... ;-)

       All routines expect to be given real or complex numbers.
       Don't attempt to use BigFloat, since Perl has currently no
       rule to disambiguate a '+' operation (for instance)
       between two overloaded entities.

       In Cray UNICOS there is some strange numerical instability
       that results in root(), cos(), sin(), cosh(), sinh(), los
       ing accuracy fast.  Beware.  The bug may be in UNICOS math
       libs, in UNICOS C compiler, in Math::Complex.  Whatever it
       is, it does not manifest itself anywhere else where Perl
       runs.

AUTHORS
       Raphael Manfredi <Raphael_Manfredi@pobox.com> and Jarkko
       Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi>.

       Extensive patches by Daniel S. Lewart <d-lewart@uiuc.edu>.

2001-02-22		   perl v5.6.1		 Math::Complex(3)
[top]

List of man pages available for IRIX

Copyright (c) for man pages and the logo by the respective OS vendor.

For those who want to learn more, the polarhome community provides shell access and support.

[legal] [privacy] [GNU] [policy] [cookies] [netiquette] [sponsors] [FAQ]
Tweet
Polarhome, production since 1999.
Member of Polarhome portal.
Based on Fawad Halim's script.
....................................................................
Vote for polarhome
Free Shell Accounts :: the biggest list on the net